
“the dance that is possible when Types are correct”
is homogenizing religious dribble. It is ego/heart nonsense pushing us to believe (!) that the netto result should look like a certain (positive) thing only; aka a dance. And if the netto result does not yet look like what we imagine (!) a dance to look like (!), this self made up fantasy, someone was not yet correct. It is this religious fanatic (zealot) belief in make-ability.
And suggesting that Living your Design has a make-able netto result called a dance. Completely ignoring duality. It is this adherence to positivity and light and new-agey whatever (like dancing). But there is no light without darkness, yin and yang, duality.
And only in the not-self is life make-able. You push -this- button, you get -that- result. Again and again and again.
In the true self, from differentiation, yes you push -this- button, yet we do not know what the result will be. Could be yes, could be no, could be this, could be that.
The dance is the dance is the dance, regardless. But the made up -condition- to be met (correctness equals dance) has little to do with it, and is most certainly not a weapon, but a lie.
And this notion of getting along, brrrr
MoonBlog 18.1