The differentiation level of organizers and facilitators and thus participants is mild, not wild.
Hunt just shared 2 recordings of him on a situation happening within Human Design events organizing.
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DAQG22GBx/
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BPWMLBD3J/
His 2 shares (important shares of personal/individual experiences and perspective) remind me of a topic that is quite large, seemingly important yet so far difficult ‘to tackle’, maybe cause HD is still so young, we are still so new to it.
Duality vs correctness vs no choice vs 4% vs trajectory vs helplessness and incompetence vs spiritual bypassing vs weaponizing vs gaslighting vs moralism vs new age vs being human vs force fucking HD into a religious mould etc etc etc etc
https://www.mcha.nl/2024/01/27/i-speak-facts/
maybe some day we, or future generations can get into it some more. (y)
An example I have is this, if someone asks if you’d like some cake, there is a response to it, jay or nay, or even if, someone just puts some cake on the table, there can be an Inner Authority reaction to the cake. But no posts, blogs, reels, features explanation videos are being made. We usually don’t even name them.
When someone triggers however a negative response, they said something negative or false, they ran over you, ignored you disrespected, or even bullied, it is someone seen as if the person is perpetrating, you, then posts, blogs, reels, features explanation videos are being made. And it seems somehow important to name them? I’ve also named quite a few, here on my Blog. Some have been deleted later, cause they apologized, cause I love them. Some were never written but ‘ought to be’.
There are tons and tons of people that are into HD, that are not for me, and yes I can say loads of stuff about them, as to why, how wrong they are, how not-self they may be, maybe/perhaps, may behave and may be are. Like Hunt mentions, I hope you do not have to explain yourself, when something is correct, and sometimes we just don’t know why something was in/correct.
Those are the good parts of these shares, great even. However the undercurrent, the personal and individual drama, me versus them, naming them yadda yadda yadda. A large part of the whole (HD Community) is dying for you to explain yourself, so we can agree (!) And if we do not agree, ah yes villains and victims once more !
How HD events are grouped around people vibing with each other. The differentiation level of organizers and facilitators and thus participants is mild, not wild. We behave amongst each other like 7 year olds. ‘Uuuh you dance weird, you smell funny, I’m gonna tell on you, you can not play with them they are MY friends’.
Reminding me of this quote by Groucho Marx: “I refuse to join any club that would have me…” to me this true for the larger HD community, I fucking hate their behaviourisms, the religious pretences of what HD is and isn’t and how one should behave and adhere to it. The fucking preachers bitching about my decisions while their own personal lives are riddled with the same fucking bullshit, ‘if not worse’ 😉
People calling each other psychotic, narcissists and all other kinds of really serious illnesses, for which they have no education to even analyse this, let alone conclude. Just because they don’t ‘agree with you’ while their own personal relations, their relationships with family or kids is way, way beyond ‘complicated’.
Pretending you are a wolf amongst sheep that need protecting, while they try to eat your liver and some mutton too. Again, 7 year olds… We’re the newbies at this too, however many certificates you acquired, whomever the fuck you interviewed or has interviewed you, or how many clients you’ve ever had. Seven.
Yet their websites are clean and pristine, priding them selves to be hard on clients, hard hard hard as if that is living your HD radically, as if there ever was a hill with monkeys and they are amongst top monkeys now. Ego/mind masturbation at your expense.
Even writing about this now, and is why I think it is both a difficult yet important topic, We…. -all- are moralising moralisation. Then again we have become the moralisers, as if there is only one way to be, to live. To live their Design, because they have infringed (?) on us living ours, just like the examples they give about me, and me about them?
No.
Something I wrote during my first HD event:
https://www.mcha.nl/2009/04/10/moonblog-28-4-holding-on/
Oh the devastation, the disappointment, the resentment, the DRAMA ~! 😀 😀
The Human experiential way 😉
The examples given however in the 2 reels by Hunt are important to let newbies (sorry, beginners) know, correctness for you, is correctness for you. A great example of having entered into something seemingly correct for you, and then, life not being static nor stagnant, to realize it is no longer correct (you no longer like this cake), to get up and move. This is golden content. Important. Mechanical, not personal.
Ok this was somewhat rambling there, which is why I said earlier, a difficult topic I find. No clarity, wisdom, or even singular truth about it, yet.
So here is some somewhat related Hokshila wisdom 😉
https://www.mcha.nl/2015/09/03/to-fall-in-love-with-what-youre-not/