• “What HD gates would you say are most attuned to the frequency of resonance?”

    “What HD gates would you say are most attuned to the frequency of resonance?”
    &
    “what activates it, and how could someone experience more of it?”

    What do you mean by resonance, first.
    and then perhaps also the frequency of resonance, second?

    Mechanically (HD wise), or musically, or NewAgey those words do mean very different things.

    Mechanically, resonance means same(ness), for instance a Transiting Gate is in resonance with your chart, aka you have the same Gate as the Moon is in right now. But then asking for the Frequency of this resonance has no bearing or meaning, it can not be determined.

    Even if some people have connected frequency (measured in Hz) to I-Ching Hexagrams, something Robin Armstrong was into, but he seemed to have a different interpretation of where (Astronomically) which Hexagram was when seeing it from an HD perspective, so those frequencies may be in or for/about the wrong Gates. I made a comparison once here
    https://www.mcha.nl/2013/04/17/i-ching-sequencing/

    Musically then/thus, well yes if this above mentioned connection pans out, apparently Gates have (fixed/singular) Frequencies in Hz, and thus we can have resonance, by vibing/vibrating in the same frequency, and thus in resonance. Which would be the same as the top way, mechanically, same Gate = same frequency = resonance

    NewAgey then, often if not always, when someone says ‘they resonate with something’, they simply mean they like it. With their mind. From a comparison point of view with a self made up moral measuring stick or adhering to someone else’ their made up comparison/measuring stick of mental liking. Being completely individual and ultimately subjective there is not one singular frequency to this then so called resonance, since the vibration -is- different for each individual. Funny how such homogenisation is therefor more diverse than the other 2 examples/angles. But also the reason why there are so many diverse and divergent/diverging schools of thought. No?

    However still in none of these 3 can I detect ‘the frequency of resonance’

    So do you mean it in yet another way/angle/experience, maybe/perhaps?

    But then you also ask: “how could someone experience more of it?” I suspect NEwAgey after all, since this is one of few yet several modalities that seeks to manipulate the outer circumstances to achieve certain and very specific results, versus learning to live with what is. Seeking more (resonance or ‘frequency of resonance’ which is still undetermined what this can possibly be), just more, since more is more good, or something. Possibly.

  • Human Design goes to Court

    On 3rd June 2020, the Court of Florence pronounced an Order establishing that there cannot be a copyright on the Human Design system.

    The Order followed a lawsuit initiated by Human Design Italia, an association claiming they had the sole ownership of Human Design copyright in Italy and the Italian language as licensee of Alan Krakower (Ra Uru Hu)’s company, Jovian Archive.

    HD Italia had gone against an Italian publisher, Terra Nuova, after the release, in June 2019, of Chetan Parkyn’s book Human Design – Scopri la Tua Vera Natura; claiming that nobody else except Human Design Italia had the right to publish any book on Human Design.

    After a speedy trial, the Judge thought otherwise. His decision stated: “…No evidence has been provided by the claimants to prove that they had exclusive rights on the ‘Human Design System’ or its teachings: those teachings cover ideas, procedures, methodologies of representation that can be freely talked about, mentioned and illustrated even by those who are not the creators, without this infringing intellectual property rights; nor, to do so, does one need to be authorized by a school or by its founders, since in our legal system the representation of ideas is free and is not subjected to cult-like behaviors.”

    The principle, stated by US Law and accepted by the Berne Convention as valid for all the countries who are part of it (and Italy is) is that copyright cannot be recognized for an “idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described,” and therefore “If Krakower cannot be the holder of a general intellectual property right on his ideas (rather than on his works), he cannot have sold it to third parties.”

    So “The object of the transfer [from Jovian Archive to Human Design Italia, ed.] cannot be the right to exploit copyright that does not exist.”

    And more: “Neither it [Jovian Archive, ed.] nor its assignees could prevent others from publishing other works on the ‘Human Design System’.”

    I am particularly pleased to release this news, because I really believe that HD, like Astrology, Kabbalah, I-Ching, the Chakra System, Neutrinos and the DNA theories on which Human Design is based, belongs to humanity as such and not to just one group of individuals.

    Of course, everyone is grateful to Ra who went through the experience of receiving the knowledge about the system from some mysterious source, and the moral rights of the discovery will always be his, but the law says that moral right is not transmissible, and ultimately, that the fruit of his experience belongs to all of us.

    As the Delhi High Court states, in a 2016 lawsuit, copyright is “not an inevitable, divine, or natural right that confers on authors the absolute ownership of their creations. It is designed rather to stimulate activity and progress in the arts for the intellectual enrichment of the public. Copyright is intended to increase and not to impede the harvest of knowledge. It is intended to motivate the creative activity of authors and inventors in order to benefit the public.”

    Moreover, this Court Order is an important precedent for any other lawsuit that might be initiated by Human Design Italia, Jovian Archive or any other organization or individual claiming intellectual property on the HD system. And it is important also for all the independent HD readers, teachers and writers – many! – that have been bullied through the years!

    Instead, Human Design has benefited a lot from the work of such independent HD practitioners and has evolved immensely from its original formulation, thanks to their commitment, research and experiences.

    Let this Court Order be the first step towards the free expansion and evolution of this beautiful science.

    Much thanks to all the people who helped in the process of gathering information to build the case defense, namely attorney-at-law Caterina Inglese, Eleanor Haspel-Portner, Ph.D (noblesciences.com), Chaitanyo (humandesignsystem.com), Karen Curry Parker (understandinghumandesign.com), Erik Memmert (newsunware.com), and of course Chetan Parkyn (humandesignforusall.com).

    For a copy of the Court order, which is a public document, in Italian and/or English, contact Marga at margajee@gmail.com

    Source: https://www.oshonews.com/2020/07/19/human-design-italian-court-case/
    Read More “Human Design goes to Court”