• MoonBlog 16.2 the cynic

    So many people achieve a sense of self worth and identity, in comparison, so through their work circle, the people they know through hobby or activity, the causes they adhere too, or not adhere too at all, whom they invite and not invite for their birthdays, by which car/brand they drive/own, what kind of house, its value, the street or neighbourhood it is in, which tools they prefer over that one, the store they do, or do not shop in, online or In Real Life. It is a form of snobbism and separation/exclusion, mentally, how they separate themselves from ‘them’, how their me, is an ‘us’.

    Even if of course there is no logic to that because of all the different people in this circle versus that one, and they meander into several different ones, since not everyone who lives in a house like theirs, pays the same amount of taxes, or indeed drives the same brand/version of car, and then very different people shop there or vote for him/her.

    Human Design helps you connect with yourself, through your own actions and your own correctness, by your very own observations and those alone. It helps you value and identify yourself, as your very own self, and is not dependant on these others in the same groceries store, or at the same tennis shoe store, anymore.

    It stops measuring and comparing with those ‘happenings’ as a meaning and knowing full well separation is there but of a very different kind, uniqueness does not need any comparison or snobbism, and has no use for self aggrandization thoughts by diminishing others nor does it look up to anything else ever again.

    You get to hold yourself warmly, by how you wash your dishes, make and drink your coffee, all by yourself, for yourself.

    Which you may want to share about with others about. But not to explain yourself, defend yourself, aggrandise yourself. Just you drinking this coffee from that machine with whatever you do or not put in it.

    Just you, by yourself, alone, being your own comfortable Inner Authority (center based or process based). Even in those moments when not that comfortable at all. Just uniquely you.
    Read More “MoonBlog 16.2 the cynic”

  • Human Design middle path

    not ‘middle of the road’
    I see a few distinct versions of Human Design practices happening

    Sandhill Crane (Antigone canadensis)

    -one is the overzealous crowd, taking the ‘wrong’ things too literal and are basically too stupid to zoom out and ‘relativize’, but more importantly, pressure themselves and peer pressure others to force-fuck this ‘Living Your Design’ into this incorrect understanding on their decision making. This is the HD cult makers (which they vehemently deny), just a handful of bullies is enough, intellectually smart, socially stupid. (Over)zealous fucktards I call these (which is a technical term). It is a mind fuck and ‘just another trap’. More incompetent than helpless.

    -another part or version is (and quite many certified professionals fall into this category) those that pretend they are better than others, calling others psychotic, narcissists, creating an HD Professionals ‘privilege’ society and making HD into a religious practice to boot, where HD becomes math; formulas, bullies here too. Incredibly banal and numbing, intellectual and social stupidity. Robotic assholes is my term for these since any sense of humanity has left them. Kindly just go fuck yourselves.

    Funny in between story: a number of/quite a few (…) Certified HD Professionals, are Flat-Earthers, no joke

    -on the other far side of the spectrum, is the make-ability idealist junkies, where weaponizing HD to serve your identified idiot is key. With or without rituals, but these are the wanna-be light workers who are lead by the dark hatters. This is ego masturbation and gratification, in the name of a better me, a better world, if only you sign up for more. These also include the many doubters and confusion artists making new versions of HD, these are the ‘intellectually challenged’, socially ok-ish, until they open their mouth/mind. New Age cow-dung sellers and dwellers, wondering why their world smells of well, cow-dung. Flaming do-good idiots whose only weapon is argumentation. Just another belief system towards hell, paved with good intentions but ultimately falls so short that they hurt themselves and others.

    – and there is a middle path in all of this kerfuffle. Which is nowhere in the middle actually, but to give it a name…
    To understand how human you are, how HD gives you mechanical absolutes yes, just not factual absolutes, not all come out, are ever witnessed or alive in you, the surrendering to that which is, and observe it, if you can, if you even can. And to include this inability too. To operate within the breadth of factual capacity and ability, availability. Sometimes more of this, some days none of it. To let your mind be judgmental, and run the show some times, because you know you are helpless and incompetent and that loving yourself means you are helpless and incompetent about it. Without ever having to need to hand over your own agency or Authority, to any one, while sometimes not being able not to. (ah yes paradoxical) To be religiously unreligious about life. To witness and see, whatever and however much as you possibly can, and can not. To include, that which is your experience. To be dualistically non-dualistic. To fuck up and see, wing it as long as not arrested for. Or sometimes do get arrested for and to include that. To be realistic about your unrealistic expectations. To be driven by your mind, your ego, your ego/mind, your lust, your false desires, unwarranted and unwanted yet fascinating fears, and your fetishes. And take this body for a spin. To observe with or without navels and anals. To stop pretending basically, being human and into HD is not a trick, nor a goal, neither smart nor stupid, just very incredibly human. To show up as yourself, the identified differentiated idiot 😉

    – oh, and, yes, ehrm, then there are those HD people on Reddit, gee whizz, ehrm….?
    Read More “Human Design middle path”

  • The differentiation level of organizers and facilitators and thus participants is mild, not wild.

    Hunt just shared 2 recordings of him on a situation happening within Human Design events organizing.

    https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DAQG22GBx/

    https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BPWMLBD3J/

    His 2 shares (important shares of personal/individual experiences and perspective) remind me of a topic that is quite large, seemingly important yet so far difficult ‘to tackle’, maybe cause HD is still so young, we are still so new to it.

    Duality vs correctness vs no choice vs 4% vs trajectory vs helplessness and incompetence vs spiritual bypassing vs weaponizing vs gaslighting vs moralism vs new age vs being human vs force fucking HD into a religious mould etc etc etc etc

    https://www.mcha.nl/2024/01/27/i-speak-facts/

    maybe some day we, or future generations can get into it some more. (y)

    An example I have is this, if someone asks if you’d like some cake, there is a response to it, jay or nay, or even if, someone just puts some cake on the table, there can be an Inner Authority reaction to the cake. But no posts, blogs, reels, features explanation videos are being made. We usually don’t even name them.

    When someone triggers however a negative response, they said something negative or false, they ran over you, ignored you disrespected, or even bullied, it is someone seen as if the person is perpetrating, you, then posts, blogs, reels, features explanation videos are being made. And it seems somehow important to name them? I’ve also named quite a few, here on my Blog. Some have been deleted later, cause they apologized, cause I love them. Some were never written but ‘ought to be’.

    There are tons and tons of people that are into HD, that are not for me, and yes I can say loads of stuff about them, as to why, how wrong they are, how not-self they may be, maybe/perhaps, may behave and may be are. Like Hunt mentions, I hope you do not have to explain yourself, when something is correct, and sometimes we just don’t know why something was in/correct.

    Those are the good parts of these shares, great even. However the undercurrent, the personal and individual drama, me versus them, naming them yadda yadda yadda. A large part of the whole (HD Community) is dying for you to explain yourself, so we can agree (!) And if we do not agree, ah yes villains and victims once more !

    How HD events are grouped around people vibing with each other. The differentiation level of organizers and facilitators and thus participants is mild, not wild. We behave amongst each other like 7 year olds. ‘Uuuh you dance weird, you smell funny, I’m gonna tell on you, you can not play with them they are MY friends’.

    Reminding me of this quote by Groucho Marx: “I refuse to join any club that would have me…” to me this true for the larger HD community, I fucking hate their behaviourisms, the religious pretences of what HD is and isn’t and how one should behave and adhere to it. The fucking preachers bitching about my decisions while their own personal lives are riddled with the same fucking bullshit, ‘if not worse’ 😉

    People calling each other psychotic, narcissists and all other kinds of really serious illnesses, for which they have no education to even analyse this, let alone conclude. Just because they don’t ‘agree with you’ while their own personal relations, their relationships with family or kids is way, way beyond ‘complicated’.

    Pretending you are a wolf amongst sheep that need protecting, while they try to eat your liver and some mutton too. Again, 7 year olds… We’re the newbies at this too, however many certificates you acquired, whomever the fuck you interviewed or has interviewed you, or how many clients you’ve ever had. Seven.

    Yet their websites are clean and pristine, priding them selves to be hard on clients, hard hard hard as if that is living your HD radically, as if there ever was a hill with monkeys and they are amongst top monkeys now. Ego/mind masturbation at your expense.

    Even writing about this now, and is why I think it is both a difficult yet important topic, We…. -all- are moralising moralisation. Then again we have become the moralisers, as if there is only one way to be, to live. To live their Design, because they have infringed (?) on us living ours, just like the examples they give about me, and me about them?

    No.

    Something I wrote during my first HD event:
    https://www.mcha.nl/2009/04/10/moonblog-28-4-holding-on/
    Oh the devastation, the disappointment, the resentment, the DRAMA ~! 😀 😀

    The Human experiential way 😉

    The examples given however in the 2 reels by Hunt are important to let newbies (sorry, beginners) know, correctness for you, is correctness for you. A great example of having entered into something seemingly correct for you, and then, life not being static nor stagnant, to realize it is no longer correct (you no longer like this cake), to get up and move. This is golden content. Important. Mechanical, not personal.

    Ok this was somewhat rambling there, which is why I said earlier, a difficult topic I find. No clarity, wisdom, or even singular truth about it, yet.

    So here is some somewhat related Hokshila wisdom 😉
    https://www.mcha.nl/2015/09/03/to-fall-in-love-with-what-youre-not/

    Read More “The differentiation level of organizers and facilitators and thus participants is mild, not wild.”

  • ‘Cause we need a little, controversy

    to all moralists, liars and other 5 centered idiots, Baffo says: “of the 12 women into HD that had sex with me, averaging not even one HD sex partner per year of being into HD

    about 4 have I taught any HD before the sex, with well over 200 that is averaging less than 1 in 50

    the other 8 I either never taught or it was after the sex.”

    If you read some of my writings and sharing and happen to experience a drive to –not– connect, great. If you do experience a drive to connect, great, you are hereby invited, asked, informed and initiated to do so through the contact page.
    Read More “‘Cause we need a little, controversy”