correctness

MoonBlog 37.5 Love and 37.6 Purpose

Beforehand, before making a decision, we can know correctness, or not, correctness.

We can observe our not-self, our mind, our external influences, our Outer Circumstances all have their conditioning on us. And also the see-saw of Distraction/Transference and Perspective/Motivation.

We can observe the body engage or not engage. Whether to external stimuli and S&A when others are involved, or through the Tone of our PHS when alone.

Afterwards and in hindsight, the experience itself of engaging or not engaging, was always Trajectory.

Correctness is no longer an observation; a bad experience does not mean not correct. Not finishing what was engaged, does not mean not correct.

Maybe/perhaps it was correct to engage, yet then also correct to not finish. Or correct to have a ‘bad’ experience. Duality after all… and (thus)… Trajectory.

Correctness is an observation and never a meaning, unless a false conclusion and a potential guilt trip by mind once more.

Also, nothing was ever ‘incorrect’, something is either correct or not correct.
Incorrect is a judgment stemming out of morality, by an imposed set of made up rules, of right and wrong for instance, correctness itself is merely a (re)cognition, an observation.
Read more

MoonBlog 30.5 Irony

When people think it’s about the shininess of the content of the bargain they propose
but it’s all about the initiation, which is irrelevant to you or the contents themselves.

It is simply correct, or, not correct.

Not because of the shiny things you offer, or the results you propose.
Correctness does not care about the this & that of it.

add-on/edit: unless the bargain is sex… I guess, then yes, promised shiny results are key 😉

But when you try to bargain something that is not sex, aahh well
get ready to be surprised 😀
Read more